Busy week, and links

October 23rd, 2009

Haven’t had much time to work on the site, but a few new pieces scattered on the Web.

It’s health insurance, not health care, that demands reform (from The Oregonian/oregonlive.com) Monday

Two new pieces today from examiner.com

Is green and sustainable really worth it?

Government’s role in our republic’s economy

Urban Bicycles Revisited

October 11th, 2009

Is a bicycle-mad Portland merely faddish?  Is the “green” way overlooking practicality and common decency?

The car may not be ideal, but is what the modern city was designed around.  For Portland—a city wearing a “progressive” name-tag with pride—to deny this, is but a regressive tact.

People come and go from the city by car.  To oppose such reality may be to reject one of the “Blessings of Liberty,” of which our Constitution stated to protect.

History shows that Portlanders have rejected the bicycle culture before.  Leading-up to the Lewis and Clark Exposition, Portland was bicycle-crazy.  Then something happened…

Fred T. Merrill—bicycle merchant and city councilman—sold 8,500 bicycles in 1898 alone, the most west of the Mississippi.  Merrill’s 1903 council campaign slogan declared “Keep Portland Wide Open.”

Bikes kept riding and Merrill re-elected.  For bicycles remained more practical than the horse-and-buggy or the expensive motor car.

Curiously, bicycle ridership nosedived that election year as unwanteds took to bike-riding and outlandish costumes.  Louder, even, were their bells ringing ad nauseam.

Thus, Establishment women—the bike-buying class—chose to reject riding in large measure, since, said Merrill, “the favouring women of the North End took to the wheel.”  High society-types found recreation elsewhere.

Will today’s hard-core urban cyclists stop when, say, a BMX on Broadway cuts them off?  Unclear.  Behaviors will change, however, when the public realizes that freedoms and liberties are impinged upon by a select few.

Consider:  bicycles are a minor annoyance.  New legislation, however, has marginalized the car—and, thus car-drivers—in deference to the urban peloton.

“Green” or not, cars still allow citizens more freedom and remain bulwarks of our economic engine.

Are bicyclists and their enthusiasts missing the forest for the trees?  Perhaps…and perhaps they should be wary of a coming class of one-speeds.

Site News

October 8th, 2009

Not only did my computer die recently (I do have a new one now), but this site is missing some posts and some other features.  I don’t know what happened, but I’ll work on it the best I can.

Some new posts are up now, and my BleacherReport profile has a new piece that I haven’t posted here yet.  I used to have the link to Bleacher report on the side panel, but you’ll have to scroll through some older posts to get it now (on this blog).

Nothing new that’s been published elsewhere, as far as I know right now, but I’ll post if and when available.

I’ll work on it the next few days, and hopefully get things going again.

Thanks for your time and interest.

Health Care Again? Well, Here’s A Real Solution

October 8th, 2009

I am close to giving up on the health care debate.  It seems rather simple to me, but the Washington pols make it complicated and, in turn, grandstand in an attempt to show the American public how important the are.  The attempt is pathetic.

Whether reform is what we need or not seems unimportant for the power-hungry in Congress.

Those on the left say we need reform, but only in the model they want to foist upon us.

Those on the right talk about the lack of need for reform of any type and cite statistics about how most Americans are happy with their health care and how any reform would transmute into rampant socialism.

Neither approach is wise, nor does either show leadership when it should count.

We need some form of reform in this arena, no question, but it is not as if Americans (and even non-Americans alike) cannot now or will not in the future get proper health care.  The issue really is who is going to pay for it all.

The first tact should be health insurance reform, not health care reform.  America is the standard-bearer for nearly everything medical and people flock here from all over the globe.  But if one wants the best, one should be paying for the best.

As for reform of health insurance, we need to return it to what it is…insurance.  What we have in most cases now passing as health insurance is a bungled mess of pre-paid health care passing itself off as true insurance.  Use it or lose it, they say.

A “public option” would simply make the whole process even more bungled and therefore more expensive.  Health Savings Accounts are a step in the right direction, but they don’t go far enough.  Money expires!  Use it or lose it again.  Ridiculous.

One thing the government can do, instead of trying to get all the dollars coming its way and redistribute them, with its large brokerage fee, is to open up insurance markets.  Put an end to the de facto pre-packaged health care monopolies that exist in each state.  Let people shop around for health insurance, don’t pigeonhole people into buying coverage that is not in their interests.

Doctors will still care for people.  Hospitals will still care for the sick.  Grandma will still be able to live out her life how she wishes.

Simply, insuring people properly is what needs to be done.  Maybe that will be more expensive—short-term, long-term or both—but it will get money into the hands of people who can make that decision, not wasted upon politicos and bureaucrats that are in no position to make such decisions in the first place.

Folks who think that government taking a larger role in the nation’s health care will make it more expensive are probably right, but once again that is not the issue.  We do have to pay for what gets done, but nobody—government in this instance—should not be taking money where either no work or substandard work is done.

It would be best to scrap the whole debate right now.  The time spent on it is already a sunken cost.

Let’s start again by doing what is needed and what is most pragmatic by turning health insurance into insuring our health.

Let Them Sing: Redemption by iTunes?

October 8th, 2009

My old not-so-trusty computer died the other day after seven-plus years of service and frustration.  Stupidly, I hadn’t backed up much of anything on that machine, so I am now starting over from scratch.  Most of my documents and music downloads are history, unless I can find and pay for a computer Jedi to ferret-out the files somehow.  I’m not holding my breath.

Anyhow, this gave me a chance to get a new computer with a much larger hard drive—I now also have an external backup drive to avoid some of the old mistakes—and I started the process of loading my old CDs into the new machine.  Many of the old discs are scattered and can’t be found right now, but I still have the bulk of my collection that I built as a teenager and into my twenties.

When I was in high school, tapes, specifically mix-tapes were the thing to do.  You picked and chose good (ok, desirable) tracks off CDs or other tapes and make a 60 or 90 minute tape.  Once the tape-deck went dinosaur, it gave way to the mix-CD.  Nice, but not as comforting or strategy-minded.  Now it is iTunes playlists, which are even more impersonal.

The goal, I guess, was to pile up tracks, so that you’d get enough to make a viable mix-tape you could play in a CD player-free car.  We even taped off the radio, and my favorite tape in high school was one of those that someone left in my car—thick with Petty, the Stones, and Zeppelin as I recall.  One of my tape players ate that one, so it is gone.

While I usually bought album-length CDs, I remember buying a couple singles at Tower Records—songs that had heavy radio airplay.  (Mildly regrettable choices such as Boys II Men’s “Motownphilly” and EMF’s “Unbelievable” both come to mind.)  The idea of the single was that it was cheaper and sometimes you got another song or two or different mixes of the same song where you couldn’t get it elsewhere.  Most of all, it was a matter of only spending a couple bucks rather than the $10 to $15 or so for the full album where there was a chance that the rest of the songs stunk and you’d have to pop the CD in and out constantly if you didn’t want to repeat it over and over.  (If you are out there, Mr. Big, you were the bane of my existence for a few weeks after I realized that you only had one half-way decent song, but good on you as you did get my money.)

So, toward the end of high school, I’d realized the error of my ways (probably just after the Joe Diffie purchase, where even the album version of “John Deere Green” was different than the radio version) and started to refine my tastes a little bit more.  All I bought from there on out—until the last couple of years and the advent of iTunes—were albums.  (The salad days of the pre-Napster-crackdown made my catalog more eclectic as well.)  I figured, rightly so, that I could listen to the bulk or entirety of these discs and rarely be disappointed.  While this approach possibly pigeonholed me where my tastes were concerned, I was going off to college soon and was determined to let my musical tastes speak for me in a way…but I wasn’t fully committed.

Sure, I had many of the same albums that everyone seemed to have in high school, though I stayed away from the ubiquitous Steve Miller Band “Greatest Hits” and Bob Marley “Legend” because hearing any of those songs—much like the Dave Matthews Band fad of the mid-to-late-nineties—made me cringe.  The music was probably good, but I just couldn’t get past the repetitive nature of it all.

Well, the chickens came home to roost my sophomore year in college, where in the common room of our suite, Dave Matthews Band played ad nauseam and in the northeast corner of my bedroom, the dulcet tones of Chris LeDoux coming out of my Magnavox stereo nearly drove my roommate, Jon, crazy.  I settled down a bit, but would usually keep at least three LeDoux CDs in the 7-disc changer—because it was mine, I guess.

In the last few years, I have bought actual CDs about as often as I go to the movies, which is to say that I count both on one hand.  I have utilized iTunes to buy a few albums and a number of compilations from artists I enjoy such as Van Morrison, Waylon Jennings, and Sam Cooke.  Price and the ease of the transaction were the chief reasons that I went to iTunes.  Matter of fact, the CDs that I’ve bought have largely been from online retailers looking to unload their wares cheaply, as well.  Off the top of my head:  Tom Petty and The Heartbreakers “Anthology,” a 3-CD set of rarities by members of The Highwaymen (Willie, Waylon, Cash, Kristofferson), a Waylon Jennings tribute album “I’ve Always Been Crazy,” Rick Danko’s “Times Like These,” Eddie Money’s “Take Me Home Tonight” (essentially a greatest hits), and a 3-CD set of Dean Martin’s greatest hits (to replace a similar set that I thought was lost at the time).

Pandora, Yahoo LaunchCast, and other online music players also opened my mind a little.  I heard a cover of Warren Zevon’s “Carmelita” by Dwight Yoakam that about crippled me.  I had to have it, so I hopped on iTunes and the only place I could find it was on an album by a fellow named Flaco Jimenez called “Partners.”  Well, “Partners” is Jimenez—a fantastic tejano-style accordianist in his own right—playing with a number of other artists on each song, sort of a duets-type album.  Most of the music is not amongst my tastes, needless to say, not that it is bad, I just don’t care for it a whole lot.  I stopped again, like I did after the Joe Diffie purchase, of buying an album based on one song.

For a while, maybe a year or two before my old desktop finally met its maker, I just listened to the few singles I’d captured before the Napster crackdown and the few singles and albums I’d bought on iTunes.   Occasionally, I’d turn on Pandora, but most of the music I had now was coming over the airwaves once again off m XM Radio.  I was content.  Still am, as a matter of fact.

This new computer, however, gave me a chance to load in my old CDs that I hadn’t listened to in a number of years because I had enough music on my old computer and coming over the XM.  (The CD player in my car finally stopped working a few years ago, as well, so most of my CDs were filed away in some manner.)  The bulk of my Napster captures are gone…perhaps I was sprinkled with a little karma dust.

I had bridled against the iTunes monster-catalog that is rather in vogue these days, but meanwhile I had no real strategy on how I was going to enjoy all of the music I’d collected over the last two decades or so.  My mother got me an iPod Shuffle for my birthday this year and that made it possible for me to get my iTunes purchases portable, and opened up another world of sorts for me.  So, I swallowed my pride and started inserting discs within the last couple of weeks.  The iTunes service does a nice job of retrieving the information, but there was still some manual input needed, nevertheless I now have most of my music at my fingertips rather than at a distance where I have to go through the machinations of walking to get the jewel case, opening it, inserting the discs, and searching for tracks.

Far from making me more frustrated, now that I have become one of the Apple-addled masses, I am thoroughly joyful when I get to hear one of the twelve Chris LeDoux albums coming over the speakers.  (I have a few more that I have yet to track down.)  When I hear something off of “Shotgun Willie,” the “Honeysuckle Rose” soundtrack, or one of the “Super Hits” collections by Willie Nelson—even the gospel album he recorded with his sister, Bobbie—I know why I love his music so much and why I’ve been to see him in concert five times (rather than hearing some of his new experimental music that doesn’t hold much water in my opinion).

In a crazy world and a scattered life in many respects, embracing my music once again has given me time to reflect on who I am, what I was, and what I may become.  My music tells me about me.  I don’t need it, like I once thought, to tell others about me.  I guess it is with the same methodology that I keep all of my worn out hats and t-shirts, too.

As my life ebbs and flows, the music is constant.  It recalls emotion and life’s experiences.   Maybe I’ll never know exactly what prompted me to get back into nostalgia-mode, but as Neil Diamond sings on (my recently imported) The Band’s “The Last Waltz” in “Dry Your Eyes”:  “If you can’t recall the reason, can you hear the people sing?”

Yep…that’s good enough for me.

Featured Story — Oregon Live Opinion Page

May 13th, 2009

A “guest opinion” piece of mine was mentioned in The Oregonian today and is the featured story on their website.  It is interesting, to say the least, over there on the comment board.

Apathy and Sam Adams

Many folks are reading quite a bit more into the piece than what is there.

I can appreciate disagreement, but a little civility goes a long way in an argument.

Update

April 2nd, 2009

Two items up on Bleacher Report.  Duke and Bill Walton.
Also, this as-of-yet unpublished letter to The Oregonian.  Yes, soccer-related once again.

In response to “Money Gap Could Block MLS Soccer Team”:

I find it welcoming that for all of the Paulson family, City of Portland, and MLS cheerleading going on at your paper, you publish an article that has some semblance of criticism of their stadia financing package.

Things never changed, though, and that’s the rub.

A money gap always existed.  The City’s plan was always expensive and shady.  Salem was never pleased with the Council’s shenanigans.

This boondoggle didn’t make any sense months ago, was even more unsound during the frenzied avant franchise days, and stinks to high-heaven now that everyone’s cards are finally on the table.

Mayor Adams pleads to the public that the “world economic crisis” is the major culprit blocking this deal.  No, it falls on Sam’s own shoulders!  For: his lies and fallacious economics are to blame.

This plan can still be scuttled.  Will it mean the end of MLS in the Rose City?  Unlikely, but a game of chicken awaits.

Portlanders can, however, stand-up and use the ballot box to show the Fourth Avenue poltroons that we don’t appreciate their tomfoolery at our expense.

Where Have You Gone Yang Yang?

March 25th, 2009

New article up at bleacherreport.com.  It is about the World Baseball Classic.

Promotion, Relegation, Patience: Keys for Soccer’s Success in the States?

March 12th, 2009

Bleacher Report has this in its entirety.  Read, rate, comment.

Poltroonery In Portland Prevails: MLS 1—City Taxpayer Nil

March 10th, 2009

This piece is also over at BleacherReport.com

Read the rest of this entry »